I recently had a disagreement with a
friend of mine that I am close to. One of my close friends was getting married
and she picked the color red as the color she wanted her bridal party to wear.
However, one of my friends who was in the bridal party told the bride to be
that “Why would you pick that color; of all of the colors in the world, why
would you pick red?” I told my friend that
it is our friends wedding and we are there to support her and not to question
her judgment especially if she knows what she wants.
I went on to say that when it is
your special day, you can pick the color(s) you want and execute everything the
way you see fit so that your day is just as special. It wasn’t my comment that
caused conflict, it was my delivery. I have learned that conflict usually
arises when a person delivers a message in a manner that is confrontational or condescending;
for my situation, my comment was direct and unwavering because I said something
one of my friends did not want to receive. In fact, she went on to say “If we
are friends, I shouldn’t have to walk on eggshells and I should be able to say what
I want”. I informed her that that is true, but you also have to realize that we
are adults and sometimes you need to keep your comments to yourself and just be
a support.
I used cooperative strategies by playing devil’s
advocate to assist in resolving this conflict so that both parties could benefit
from this conversation. I presented the same scenario but I just reversed the
parties involved (O’Hair & Wiemann, 2009, p. 212). Although the process of
NVC encourages
us to focus on what we and others are observing separate from our
interpretations and judgments, I wanted my friend to “put the shoe on the other
foot” I wanted her to “step out of herself” and analyze the situation from both
perspectives without me passing judgment but so that she could understand the
frustration of our friend/the bride –to-be.
I felt applying some of the
principles of nonviolent communication as a strategy to resolve this conflict
would allow both parties to be respectful to each other’s views and to share
their true feelings while being sensitive to each other’s views as well.
NVC places
strong emphasis on personal responsibility for
our actions and the choices we make when we respond to others, as well as how
to contribute to relationships based in cooperation and collaboration.
As a friend to the bride-to-be and to my girlfriend, I wanted my girlfriend
to recognize the needs of the bride-to be. Although I was able to get both
parties to speak, at times the conversation was heated and intense. Although
they articulated their feelings, the bride-to- be told my girlfriend that she did
not want her in her wedding and did not want her support for her wedding. I was
sad that things turned out the way it did, but I understood completely. I am
happy to say that although the bride-to-be did not invite our friend to the
wedding, time did heal this wound and they are now on speaking terms again and
they managed to forgive each other and focus on the friendship.
For the sake of the above conflict, it was not appropriate for me to ask my colleagues
for advice on communication skills to resolve the above conflict.
References:
O'Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2009). Retrieved:
July 23, 2012. Real communication. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.
The Center for Nonviolent Communication.
(n.d.). Retrieved: July 23, 2012. The center for nonviolent
communication. Retrieved from
www.cnvc.org
Nicky